Feature
Project management is undergoing one of its most significant changes since the advent of digital collaboration tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to change how we analyze data, predict risks and use resources more efficiently, yet early adopters are discovering that AI's value in project management comes not from automation, but from augmentation.
The challenge isn't technical, but human. While AI excels at processing datasets and identifying patterns, it struggles with the context, culture and complex stakeholder dynamics that determine project success. Meanwhile, human judgment — our ability to read between the lines, navigate organizational politics and make decisions with incomplete information remains important.
How do project managers use AI's analytical power without losing the nuanced judgment that separates successful projects from failed ones? The answer lies in creating a dynamic partnership based on four principles. Each of these principles amplifies the other's strengths while compensating for its limitations.
Table of Contents
- 1. Governance: The Strategic Foundation
- 2. Execution: Translating AI Governance Strategy Into Project Management Practices
- 3. Culture: Bridging Data and Workplace Reality
- 4. Process: Institutionalizing AI Oversight
- How the Decision Process Works
- AI Implementation Issues Project Managers Should Know
- What Success Looks Like
- The Partnership Evolution
1. Governance: The Strategic Foundation
Successful AI integration begins with clear oversight structures, John Samuel, global chief operating officer at CGS, told Reworked. Without governance, even the most sophisticated AI tools misalign with business objectives or ethical standards.
"What's needed first is policy: the guardrails that ensure AI efforts align with your company's values and legal obligations. Think of it as your 'AI constitution,'" Samuel said. His approach centers on establishing AI committees with audit-level authority — groups that evaluate initiatives, comply with regulations and align with business strategy.
Samuel's AI governance approach establishes the technology as an advisor, not a decision-maker. Consider how a GPS provides navigation recommendations while the driver retains control of the vehicle. Similarly, AI offers insights while project managers maintain authority over decisions.
"AI is not a shortcut. It is a force multiplier," Samuel said. "The future is not humans adapting to AI. It is AI and humans evolving together."
While governance sets the strategic guardrails, these principles need application in day-to-day project work. This is where execution comes into play, translating oversight into actionable project decisions.
2. Execution: Translating AI Governance Strategy Into Project Management Practices
Translating governance principles into daily project management workflows requires improved capabilities and critical thinking, said Ethan Miller, vice president of delivery services at Hylaine.
Miller's execution approach bridges the gap between policy and practice. Where governance sets boundaries, execution requires project managers to engage with AI outputs, questioning recommendations and making sure insights are realistic.
"Critical thinking and healthy skepticism help PMs scrutinize AI outputs and avoid acting on inaccurate results that could derail projects," Miller explained. This isn't about distrusting technology, it's about applying judgment to validate and refine algorithmic suggestions.
"Interpreting meaning from empirical data helps project managers understand what's behind AI-generated insights and translate them into actionable decisions," Miller notes. This execution approach requires both technical literacy and enhanced soft skills, creating a feedback loop that strengthens both AI effectiveness and professional judgment.
Execution applies AI outputs thoughtfully, but even skilled application falls short without organizational context.
3. Culture: Bridging Data and Workplace Reality
Cultural interpretation becomes important when sophisticated analysis meets messy organizational reality, Sara Gallagher of the Persimmon Group added. Even with strong governance and skilled execution, AI fails without understanding organizational dynamics, informal workflows and political realities.
"Without a human in the middle, execs will know just enough to be dangerous,” Gallagher warned. “They'll get automated 'red flag alerts' without context, sparking a fire drill.”
Cultural dimensions make project managers trusted interpreters who translate algorithmic insights into culturally relevant, actionable tasks. Effective project managers are "shoring up their reputation as trusted advisors" while "helping leaders ask better questions before they get dazzled by the next AI demo,” she said.
It also helps AI recommendations resonate with people and context, but even the best judgment can be lost without consistent procedures. Process institutionalizes these practices.
4. Process: Institutionalizing AI Oversight
Institutionalizing oversight through structured workflows and systematic skill development completes the framework, said Jason Abrams, senior director of program management at Rightpoint. Where the other steps in the AI-project management framework establish principles and demonstrate application, establishing process creates sustainable mechanisms that make sure organizations follow these practices.
"A key governance mechanism to ensure AI remains an advisor rather than a decision-maker is the deliberate inclusion of a phase we call 'Synthesize AI Outputs,'" Abrams explained. This isn't just a review step, but a requirement that project managers interpret, contextualize and communicate algorithmic insights before taking action.
His process approach also emphasizes systematic training in AI literacy, including prompt engineering, iterative questioning and output refinement. "Upskilling project managers is going to empower and enable effective adoption," Abrams said. This keeps technology a tool that professionals engage with rather than a black box delivering unquestioned verdicts.
"The ability to clearly communicate and educate the outputs of our AI tools will always require a strong human touch," Abrams added, highlighting how process creates a system to translate algorithmic recommendations for different stakeholders.
With all four elements in place — governance, execution, culture and process — project managers have a comprehensive framework for AI use.
Conference
Oct
20
Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo Orlando 2025
Register
Conference
Oct
27
Gartner HR Symposium/Xpo Orlando 2025
Register
How the Decision Process Works
The mechanism operates as four filters:
- Validity Check: Does this recommendation align with project constraints and stakeholder needs?
- Cultural Relevance: How will this land within our organizational dynamics?
- Strategic Alignment: Does this fit with our broader objectives and ethical standards?
- Systematic Integration: What happens when we combine AI insights with human knowledge?
By applying these filters, project managers dynamically adjust their reliance on AI compared with human judgment. The balance shifts based on context, where high-stakes decisions lean toward human judgment, while routine analysis relies more on AI. All four experts agreed that the key is active engagement: Every AI suggestion passes through these human-judgment filters before implementation.
AI Implementation Issues Project Managers Should Know
Project managers can build this framework systematically, the experts said. While the framework provides guidance, real-world execution presents challenges. Recognizing common pitfalls helps project managers apply these elements effectively. They include:
- Overreliance on AI Outputs: Teams may stop questioning algorithmic recommendations, Miller said, especially when they seem accurate. Managers should require teams to explain why they're accepting AI suggestions, not just what those suggestions are.
- Governance Theater: AI committees may look impressive on paper but lack real authority, Samuel said. Committees need audit-level clout to prevent "decoration" instead of protection.
- Cultural Blindness: Technical validation alone is not enough, Gallager added. AI insights must fit the organization.
- Process Bypassing: Skipping the "Synthesize AI Outputs" phase undermines systematic oversight.
- Skill Development Stagnation: Ongoing learning is essential; AI literacy is a process, not one-time.
What Success Looks Like
Samuel’s governance framework focuses on decision quality, comparing AI-informed outcomes against human-driven ones so accuracy improves while keeping stakeholders happy.
Gallagher emphasized cultural success, measuring how much stakeholders trust AI recommendations through surveys that reveal whether the advice feels genuinely relevant rather than superficially impressive.
Meanwhile, Miller looks at execution health by tracking how actively project managers engage with AI tools. Healthy integration shows up when managers question, refine and contextualize the system’s suggestions rather than accepting them passively.
The Partnership Evolution
When monitored and refined, this framework results in AI amplifying human expertise rather than replacing it. Together, Governance, Execution, Culture and Process create a sustainable, high-performing partnership between technology and professional judgment.
"The future is AI and humans evolving together,” Samuel said. This evolution requires project managers who operate across all four dimensions — serving as strategic advisors, skilled practitioners, cultural interpreters and process guardians.
The result isn't just better use of AI tools, but AI-enabled partnerships that improve both technological capability and professional judgment, so projects remain grounded with experienced human practitioners.
Editor's Note: What other considerations should project managers keep in mind when adding AI to the mix?
- AI Can Improve Project Management or Cause Chaos. The Choice Is Yours — AI promises to eliminate project management busywork, but only with the right approach. Strategies to onboard AI tools effectively and avoid chaos.
- Round Pegs and Square Holes: Why AI Adoption Requires a Focus on Culture — AI’s impact isn't inherent in the technology itself but in how it is deployed. Will it be a means to cut corners, or a catalyst for growth and innovation?
- Workplace Politics vs. AI — No matter how sophisticated your AI tools are, they can't overcome the toxic power struggles, favoritism and biased decision-making that permeate organizations.