News Analysis
Google has quietly launched a seemingly minor feature that raises deeper questions about whether organizations benefit more from tightly integrated native tools or from sprawling third-party ecosystems. The new Feeds app for Google Chat allows teams to integrate RSS or Atom feeds directly into their conversations, delivering real-time updates from news sources, blogs and industry research without leaving the platform.
The app itself is simple. Teams can subscribe to multiple feeds per space, with new posts automatically delivered as messages. The goal is to eliminate "the need for context switching to monitor external information sources" by keeping team members up-to-date within the context of ongoing project discussions, according to Google’s announcement.
Yet this launch isn't primarily about feeds. It's about Google's broader strategic bet that integration will matter more than customization. Google is positioning Chat to compete with Slack and Microsoft Teams "in a very Google way: by emphasizing native intelligence and information flow over extensibility," according to Elika Dadsetan-Foley from Visions.
Table of Contents
- Google's Consolidation Play
- Native Integration's Advantages
- The Extensibility Cost
- Context Switching: Promise vs. Reality
- Baseline Content Features in a Maturing Collaboration Market
- Google Chat With Feeds Signals Its Future Strategic Development
Google's Consolidation Play
Google isn't attempting to displace Slack or Teams through superior features. The Feeds app represents "less a replacement and more as a consolidation play within Google Workspace," Dadsetan-Foley explained. The strategy reduces friction for teams already using Gmail, Docs and Drive rather than attempting to win over power users who value customization above everything else.
Google is expanding Chat's scope "from a basic messaging layer to a holistic contextually aware work environment,” said Baruch Labunski, chief executive at Rank Secure. By making Feeds a built-in feature, Google Chat and Feeds work together, while Teams and Slack require time-consuming and at times, costly external integrations.
This represents a different philosophy from competitors. "Rather than positioning Chat as an open integration marketplace, Google appears to be emphasizing native, tightly integrated features that align with the broader Workspace ecosystem," explained Jeremy Rambarran, director of campus and clinical services at Touro New York College of Podiatric Medicine. This mirrors Google's historical approach of prioritizing simplicity and reduced administrative overhead over maximal extensibility.
Native Integration's Advantages
The most tangible benefit emerges in deployment and daily operations. Kishore Bitra leads the collaboration engineering team at the City of Baltimore, managing collaboration services across WebEx, Teams, Zoom, SharePoint, Slack and Google Workspace for government clients. He sees these distinctions in practice. "MS Teams is retiring the 'Connectors,' which is an easy way to add RSS, and is forcing users toward Power Automate workflows," he explained. "It is for sure more powerful, but requires significantly more effort to set up just to read a news feed. Not every end user is tech-savvy; they might not know how to create the rule setup in Power Automate."
While Slack requires installing an RSS app from its directory, which Bitra said isn’t difficult, Google Chat Feeds prove more comfortable for typical users. Google's advantage lies in "default availability: fewer decisions, fewer permissions, fewer vendors," Dadsetan-Foley emphasised. "For many organizations, especially smaller teams or less technical users, that simplicity matters more than flexibility."
Slack and Teams replicate this functionality but typically rely on third-party apps or bots, Labunski pointed out. Google's native approach eliminates these friction points for Workspace customers.
The Extensibility Cost
Yet the same integrated design that makes Feeds easier to deploy also makes it less adaptable. "Google Chat doesn't have a feature to tag people automatically,” Bitra said. “It lacks the filter feature when compared with Teams and Slack. The native feed app just posts everything, no filters, no logic, no formatting controls."
In environments monitoring dozens of feeds across multiple spaces, no filtering and automation makes a productivity tool into a distraction. While Slack maintains superior ecosystems for custom, granular integrations and Teams offers powerful connections to other services through enterprise ownership, managing several hundred feeds without proper filtering leads to information overload that disrupts workflow, Labunski said..
"Compared to Slack, Google Chat is still less extensible and less beloved by power users who want deep customization, automation and niche integrations," Dadsetan-Foley acknowledged. "Slack's ecosystem remains stronger for complex workflows and cross-tool orchestration."
Slack's app marketplace and Teams' integration with Power Platform help organizations build tailored workflows, complex bots and cross-system automations, Rambarran said. While native features reduce setup overhead, they also constrain how far teams adapt the platform beyond Google's intended use cases.
Context Switching: Promise vs. Reality
To be clear, Google still operates a large and active Workspace Marketplace, but its recent Chat strategy suggests the company is prioritizing native, first-party features over turning Chat itself into an open integration platform.
Central to Google's value proposition is reducing context switching, or the productivity drain of constantly moving between applications and dashboards. The reality proves more nuanced. The Feeds app does reduce context switching "to a degree" by delivering external updates into spaces where conversations and decisions are already going on, Rambarran said.
However, "the reduction in context switching depends on how thoughtfully feeds are configured,” he warned. “Poorly curated or overly noisy feeds can become distractions rather than productivity enhancers."
Bitra's assessment from IT administration is even more reserved. When asked whether Feeds meaningfully reduces context switching, his answer is blunt: "Not really." While headline delivery works well for awareness, knowing about new security vulnerabilities or ransomware attacks, there are still limitations. "If we need to do something about the article, we still need to click the link and open it in a browser, which doesn't render the full article or tool inside chat,” he said.
This challenge requires organizational discipline beyond what technology provides, Dadsetan-Foley warned. "Centralizing feeds reduces tool-switching, but without strong norms it can easily become another stream of noise. Technology can lower friction; it can't replace intentional communication practices."
Baseline Content Features in a Maturing Collaboration Market
Perhaps the most significant insight is that built-in content delivery no longer represents a competitive differentiator. "It is definitely a baseline feature; Google didn't invent anything new in this space,” Bitra said. “They are just filling the space." The value comes from making it native and thereby improving user experience.
Built-in content delivery is increasingly becoming a baseline expectation, particularly as organizations seek to consolidate tools, Rambarran agreed. However, "the differentiator lies less in the existence of the feature and more in how seamlessly it integrates into everyday workflows,” he said. Google's Feeds app stands out not because feed delivery is novel, but because it doesn’t require external configuration.
"What differentiates platforms now isn't whether they can deliver content, but how intelligently and contextually they do so," Dadsetan-Foley said. Google is betting that its strengths in search, data parsing and artificial intelligence will eventually make Chat feel more anticipatory than reactive.
If native feed integration represents merely catching up to baseline expectations, Google must deliver on the promise of intelligent, contextual delivery to justify its architectural choices.
Webinar
On demand
Fuel Your Front Line: Workforce Trends Shaping 2026
Get expert insight into the tools and tactics top frontline teams will need in 2026.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Fix the Disconnect Between Projects and Profit
Your margins are hiding in disconnected data. Let's find them.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
AI in Customer Service: Faster Resolutions, Happier Customers
Don’t let rising demand burn out your team. See how to build a smarter, more resilient support org.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Accelerating Healthcare Ops with AI
Sign up to see how your peers are putting AI to work — and making it stick.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
From Nice-to-Have to Non-Negotiable: Prove the Value of Your EX Stack
Transform your tech stack: prove its value, secure your future.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
The Great Workforce Breakdown (And How to Stop It)
Disconnected employees. Failing communication. It’s time to turn things around.
Watch Now
Google Chat With Feeds Signals Its Future Strategic Development
The broader pattern reveals Google's direction. Google has abandoned attempts to court developers to build apps for Chat, instead deciding "to just build the most popular features itself," Bitra said.
Rambarran sees this reinforcing a broader pattern: favoring integrated native capabilities over expansive third-party ecosystems. This approach prioritizes reliability, security and ease of administration for organizations wanting fewer moving parts.
This represents "a clear prioritization shift toward native intelligence and simplicity rather than toward containerized sprawling ecosystems," Labunski said.
The endgame is clear, according to Dadsetan-Foley: "The Feeds app isn't about replacing Slack overnight — it's about making Google Chat more sufficient and reducing reasons to leave the Workspace environment in the first place."
Whether this proves successful depends on execution. The outcome hinges on how Google balances simplicity with flexibility, and whether the company maintains its ease-of-use advantages while addressing the extensibility gaps that frustrate power users and large organizations, Labunski said.
For now, Google Chat with Feeds represents a clear choice: integrated simplicity with acknowledged limitations, or the complexity and capabilities of more extensible platforms. There's no universal right answer, only the question of which tradeoffs align with each organization's needs and priorities.
Editor's Note: Catch up on more digital workplace news:
- When Virtual Reality Bites: How Meta's $70B Metaverse Bet Crashed — Meta’s metaverse retreat says less about the future of VR — and more about Silicon Valley building expensive solutions to problems no one asked for.
- Inside Atlassian's Plan to Make Dia an AI Browser Built for Real Work — Atlassian thinks your browser should be smarter. With Dia, it wants to turn tabs, apps and chaos into one AI-powered workspace.
- Slack's AI Integration Ambitions Are Rewriting – and Testing – Data Trust — Slack’s new AI APIs promise smarter workflows, but as data flows through more integrations, experts say the real risk isn’t ownership but lost control & trust.