Editorial
There was a time when data ownership was power. The more you collected, the more potential you held. But that mindset no longer works. Today, data without structure, context and accessibility is a liability. If it can’t be used, it has no value.
Let’s be blunt: Most organizations are still stuck with siloed systems and monolithic architectures.
They’re optimizing storage instead of usability. Layering AI on top of disconnected systems instead of redesigning how data flows. The real bottleneck isn’t lack of AI, it’s lack of readiness for it.
The Shift: From Data Ownership to Data Usefulness
Owning data does not create value. Using data does. And not just once, but in consistent, repeatable ways across workflows and systems.
Usefulness means:
- A composable search engine pulls from governed content models across your PIM, CMS and customer data platform
- A customer service chatbot can retrieve personalized answers based on dynamic customer metadata
- Your product team can reconfigure product pages, offers or recommendations in real time
To do this at scale, businesses need a componentized approach to their data, content and knowledge. And that begins with a composable information architecture.
Related Article: How to Tell If Your Company Is Truly Data-Driven — and What to Do If It’s Not
What Composability Really Means
Composability isn’t just a tech buzzword. It’s a business design principle. It means building modular, interoperable components for data, services and knowledge that can be easily reassembled and reused in different contexts.
In practice, this looks like:
- API-first micro-services that separate catalog, search and recommendation engines
- Containerized AI/ML pipelines that scale independently from core systems
- Content components that can be reassembled based on customer context
- Data mesh architectures that decentralize ownership but align through shared standards
If your systems are monolithic and your data is entangled, you can’t scale AI, personalization or innovation. You’re stuck rebuilding the same thing over and over.
Calibrating Composability Across Four Strategic Spectra
Four Factors to Calibrate Your Composability Strategy
Why Information Architecture Is the Linchpin
Composability only works when the underlying data is structured, governed and semantically aligned.
That’s the job of information architecture (IA):
- Define shared vocabularies (taxonomy)
- Model relationships (ontology)
- Apply consistent metadata to content, products and interactions
- Enable reuse across contexts without rework
IA enables organizations to shift from content blobs to content components; from static dashboards to real-time recommendations; from siloed teams to orchestrated customer journeys.
Related Article: The 3 Elements Every AI-Driven Tech Stack Needs to Compete
Real-World Impact: From Clutter to Clarity
We’ve seen this transformation firsthand:
- A global brand reduced product returns by 18% by improving product taxonomy and enriching digital content with consistent specs
- A technology provider launched a self-service knowledge hub using structured metadata, cutting support ticket volume by 30%
- A B2B manufacturer tied promotions to real-time inventory and increased campaign ROI by 22%
In each case, the payoff didn’t come from acquiring more data but from making existing data useful.
Stop Chasing Data. Start Structuring It.
If your AI roadmap is stalled… if your teams are drowning in spreadsheets… if your insights arrive too late to act on, don’t buy another analytics tool.
Start with structure.
- Inventory what you have. What data is being used? What’s just sitting?
- Define key entities and relationships. How should data connect across systems?
- Develop shared taxonomies and metadata. Ensure common language and labels.
- Align IA to business capabilities. Don’t model data for its own sake.
This is not a backend IT exercise. It’s a strategic capability. And it’s how you move from a world of digital clutter to one of composable, AI-ready knowledge.
Your Roadmap to Data Usefulness: A Step-by-Step Guide
1. Audit & Inventory
- What data do you have?
- Where is it stored?
- Who uses it and how?
2. Define Business Capabilities
- Do you need real-time pricing?
- Personalized experiences?
- Faster onboarding for new products or services?
3. Build the Information Architecture
- Develop taxonomies and ontologies.
- Standardize metadata across platforms (PIM, CMS, CRM, etc.).
- Link related entities like SKUs, content, regions and categories.
4. Enable Composability
- Use APIs to make content portable.
- Store data in modular formats that support reuse (e.g., content blocks, microdata).
5. Embed Governance
- Define ownership and quality rules.
- Set up scorecards and feedback loops to sustain structure over time.
6. Test and Refine
- Apply the architecture to a pilot use case.
- Measure success in terms of decision velocity, user experience or AI performance.
This roadmap isn’t a one-time project. It’s a capability-building program. And it’s essential to turning your data from a passive asset into an active enabler of business agility.
Conference
Sep
16
HR Tech Conference Las Vegas 2025
Register
Conference
Oct
27
Gartner HR Symposium/Xpo Orlando 2025
Register
Related Article: Single Vendor vs. Best of Breed: Which Data Stack Model Works Best?
Don’t Just Store It. Structure It.
Organizations that treat data as a static asset are being left behind. The ones pulling ahead are those who structure it, surface it and synchronize it across systems.
This isn't about adding more tools to your tech stack. It’s about connecting the dots between your business goals and the data that powers them.
Composable infrastructure isn’t just more scalable, it’s more intelligent. It lets you reuse what works, test what doesn’t and continuously optimize how data powers experience. But it only works if your foundation, your information architecture, is designed to support it.
So, stop building on silos. Start engineering for scale, reuse and intelligence. And that starts with composable information architecture.
Learn how you can join our contributor community.
